Imagine that you do the same job year over year, and in each year you get paid less.  This is the condition in which most physicians find themselves.  It may be difficult for some to have sympathy  for physicians because many believe that they make lots of money, though some do.  Still, physicians spent most of their 20’s and some of their early 30’s getting the training to provide services for which they are now get paid less and less to provide.

A few weeks ago I had reason to visit an Orthopedic Surgeon for a wrist injury.  Upon making the appointment I learned that this practice has done something that I believe few physicians can do, but many more will; he quit taking insurance.  As one with a  strong free market bias, I had to learn more.  A few days after my initial visit I called just to discuss his decision and what it required of him and his practice.

He admitted that his income had initially fallen, but that it is slowly on the return. He reduce his office staff by one half, and restructure his practice.  Though he continues to provide orthopedic services, he expanded his scope of offerings to include services for which insurance companies will not pay, and patients would;  he add longevity services for older patients seeking to avoid disease.  These services are largely unsupported by insurance, still people willingly pay for services they believe to be valuable, and indeed this is.

Additionally, he freely admits that had he been younger with medical school debt and kids aiming for college, he wouldn’t have been able to make this move.  But with both of those behind him, he guided his business offerings to a new audience, and one who would pay cash he loves his work as  do his patients.

There is no better example of  free-market medicine than what has been going on in the area of Dermatology.  With the introduction of Botox to remove wrinkles, and a new host of dermal fillers and lasers, some dermatologists  have evolved their practice,  in part or completely, into cosmetic or aesthetic medicine for which it’s patients pay cash.

Cosmetic medicine, is an area of healthcare where third party players have little or no influence  because neither patient or practitioner expect a third party organization to pay for the services.  These are not life saving service, they are life enhancing services.  This is free market medicine at its finest, but it’s not new.  Dentists and most veterinarians have similar transaction relationships with their customers, neither are heavily influenced by insurance companies, and they seem to be doing just fine, even arguably better than classic medicine.

So what are we to make of this.

Have you ever tried picking up mercury with your fingers?  That’s precisely how the economy works; human beings are amazingly adept at improving their lot in life through new and innovative means.  In healthcare we are already seeing changes in the physician/patient relationship and its interaction.  Quickly disappearing is the paternalistic relationship that had dominated physician/patient relationships in the past.  The new relationship is more adult to adult; one in which the physician clearly directs care, but also one in which the patient is also part customer.  For healthcare, this is exceptionally healthy.  The patient rather than the payer or insurance company has a customer like relationship with the physician, or private medical services distributor.

For some physicians with whom I’ve shared this perspective, this is troubling until they realize that a more provider-customer relationship actually produces more revenue.  This we know: physicians are smart people and know how to do math, they will certainly evolve their care practices in creative ways from which we all will benefit.  Free market medicine will grow in the future, and some innovative companies have begun to figure it out

Thomas A. Coss, RN

  • Share/Bookmark

Munchausen Syndrome is a condition in which a person repeatedly acts as if they have a physical or mental disorder when, in truth, they have purposefully caused the symptoms.  A worse manifestation of this syndrome called Munchausen Syndrome by Proxy, or MSP, is when the patient inflects injury on others so that they can appear to have come to the rescue and are the “hero” when they are not; this, I’m afraid, defines congressional democrats on healthcare.

I’m not suggesting that the democrats are knowingly inflicting harm, though they are, but the reward to them in passing this legislation without full regard to its impact, is suspicious.  They are so looking forward to the signature parade at the White House, that they can’t see past the process.  In the legislative sense, this is MSP at its worse.

The U.S. jobless rate for October  jumped up 0.4 percentage point to 10.2%, the highest level since April 1983. The government’s broader measure of unemployment shot up even more, rising half a point to 17.5%, still with this in front of them, the democrats insist on pushing through their vision of reality.  The democrats are driving this train past all the alarms and warning of dangers ahead, and we’re stuck facing the results of the inevitable derailment.

This future is sad, easily predictable, guaranteed to get worse and fundamentally unnecessary. Perhaps  this will help:

Presume for a moment that you have a headache because someone is beating you on the head with a stick; you can: a) take medication for the headache or b) take away the stick. The government chose “a” (pass a huge healthcare bill and taxes to support it); I recommend “b” (lower the tax burden, don’t add to it, and free up capital investment in healthcare by reductions in capital gains.) By no means should the government be messing around in an industry of which they understand little, that was responsible for 56% of US job growth from 2002 to 2006, and an industry in which America has a strong comparative advantage that doesn’t outsource well.

Healthcare is complicated, as an RN, I can assure that is true beyond anyone’s imagination.  Should the House and Senate bill come into law in any fashion as currently seen, we are in grave condition indeed.  We all need to begin doing all we can to stay as healthy as possible, because should you get sick, the last thing you will want is healthcare.

Tom

  • Share/Bookmark

This just came into my twitter home page:

BarackObama Tomorrow will mark a year since our historic victory. Do you have a favorite 2008 Election Day memory? Share your stories via #Nov4 21 minutes ago from web

 I “friended” the President to keep up on what he or his staff  feels to be important.  Frankly, I thought it might be a great way for the new administration to send out succinct (perhaps that’s the problem) messages to the electorate on what they might want us to know.  As it turns out all it’s used for is campaign stuff, support specific legislative items, send letters, stuff like that.  Still, perhaps that’s ok, who knows the proper use of twitter in a standing administration; it’s a question that very likely never came up before.  Just maybe this makes as good sense as any other use of twitter; then there was this post by the Obama staff. 

I’m struggling with this.  Of all that is going on, just why is it of interest to anyone to take a little trip down memory lane and share favorite story of a “historic” election?  Surely he could have easily said: “It’s been a year folks, how am I doing”?  Or perhaps something more contrite like: “Gees, who knew.  Now they want results?”  So ask yourself this, if you could send a statement to over 2.5 million people, what would you say.  Could you in your wildest imagination ask people to share their memories of you?   

 This is nothing less than inward focusing narcicism, straight up; as sad as it is tragic.

  • Share/Bookmark