Last June, the Senate Judiciary Committee began hearings on texting. Included in the discussion were executives from AT&T, Verizon along with othere the focus of which was the nature of charging for text messages. Though the hearings were interesting, the real headline is in the data surrounding texting itself

In 2008 over one trillion text messages were sent in the US.  According to AT&T, texting grew from 2.4 billion in January of 2007 to over 31.1 billion in January of this year.  The direct costs per text were estimated at approximately three tenths of one cent each, with an average charge to the telephone subscriber of 1 cent per text message.  Approximately 420 text messages can fit the bandwith it takes to have a one  minute conversation.

Why is text messaging growing so much?  Well simply because it is efficient.  The text message forces the sendor to be succinct (you have only 160 characters in which to get your point across) and it can be very quickly consumed.  Over the weekend, by oldest daughter told me that she just heard a voice mail left by her sister 4 days ago.  This isn’t to say that she’s disengaged, just that voice mail is not the preferred mean of communication.  She went on to say that occassionally she’ll get text messages from her friends telling her to check her voice mail.  Texting is simple, succinct, fast, and it’s semi-perminant.  You can save a text message to refer to later on, not as easy in voicemail.

In a world in which information flows so effortlessly and at near zero cost, texting speaks more of the future than the past.  Who know that email would become “so yesterday” so soon.

Tom

  • Share/Bookmark

Just doing the math, if Obama was to stand by his no tax pledge to the middle class, than his 1.6 trillion dollar healthcare plan would require a monthly tax of $2,965 per month on households making $250,000 per year and more.  This, to use Obama’s term, is unsustainable.

One ought to consider first the financial crisis of last year.  In the financial industry, unlike the healthcare industry, there is an abundance of detailed, historical transaction data.  The financial industry led in the development and use of highly sophisticated computer systems that allows individuals to make cash withdrawals from nearly any ATM you can find,  anywhere in the world.  Healthcare is likely decades away from that level of ubiquity of healthcare information. 

So ask yourself this, if the government was unable to foresee the financial crisis despite its access to such detailed information, how is that same government going to do better in taking over an industry where such detail is not even available?  This isn’t hope, this is the government behaving stupidly.

Thomas A. Coss, RN

  • Share/Bookmark